Document: MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/410.0 MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 2020-10-22 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-10-22
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
The document unveils a series of events indicating unfair treatment against Aaron Surina. His ex-spouse, Sirinya Polarj, has allegedly violated multiple court orders, including her responsibilities for health insurance and medical expenses for their children. Despite explicit court directives, Sirinya’s consistent non-compliance undermines Aaron’s rights as a co-parent and raises questions about her respect for the legal process.
Furthermore, Sirinya’s alleged repeated disregard for the court-ordered parenting plan and instances of “custodial interference” present significant ethical issues. These actions infringe upon Aaron’s parental rights and may adversely impact the children’s wellbeing. The documents also suggest possible harassment by Sirinya, including trespassing and attempting to lure the children into her car, actions that are in direct violation of court orders and could potentially endanger the children.
The situation intensifies with Sirinya’s refusal to fulfill her court-ordered obligation to pay for out-of-pocket medical expenses and contribute to the children’s well-being. This has resulted in financial strain on Surina and a precarious living situation for the children, with evidence of neglect and a lack of a stable environment.
Aaron has sought accountability from Sirinya through the court, requesting that she explain her actions and answer for her non-compliance. Despite this, his requests for monetary judgment, including past child support overpayment and past due medical support, have not been specified with amounts, dates, or interest. This lack of clarity suggests potential bias or negligence in the court’s procedures.
Additionally, the document mentions potential fines, penalties, and sanctions for the petitioner’s violations, yet these seemingly do not apply, further indicating a potential injustice against Surina. Lastly, Surina alleges domestic violence against him, but the document fails to provide details or context, raising questions about whether this issue was adequately addressed by the court.
Overall, Aaron Surina appears to be in an unjust situation where his rights as a parent are infringed upon, his financial concerns are overlooked, and his allegations of domestic violence seemingly disregarded. The document conveys a pressing need for the court to rectify these issues, ensuring Aaron’s rights are protected and justice is served.
About The Author
