Document: ORDER DIRECTING ISSUANCE OF WRIT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/417.0 ORDER DIRECTING ISSUANCE OF WRIT 2020-11-09 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-11-09
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The document titled “ORDER DIRECTING ISSUANCE OF WRIT” appears to be riddled with potential biases against the father, Aaron Surina. It involves a custody dispute over a minor child, where the petitioner has alleged that Aaron is holding the child in violation of a lawful court order. The court has ordered for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, demanding Aaron to produce the child in court for determining the appropriate legal placement.
From Aaron’s perspective, this document raises concerns about potential unfairness or unethical conduct. Firstly, the court appears to have taken at face value the petitioner’s allegations that Aaron is violating a court order without providing any substantive evidence or giving Aaron the opportunity to refute the claim. This bias could potentially infringe on Aaron’s right to a fair trial and due process.
Furthermore, the court has ordered for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, a serious legal mechanism usually reserved for severe cases where a person’s liberty is at stake, based solely on the petitioner’s allegations. This could be seen as a disproportionate response that unnecessarily escalates the situation, reflecting a bias against Aaron.
The court’s directive for Aaron to produce the child before the court also raises questions about potential infringement of Aaron’s parental rights. This could be seen as a presumption of guilt rather than innocence, potentially violating Aaron’s right to a fair trial and due process.
In conclusion, from Aaron’s perspective, this document could be seen as an example of judicial bias and unfair treatment against him in the ongoing custody dispute.
About The Author
