Document: ORDER
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/419.0 ORDER 2020-11-10 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-11-10
Summary (Justice Demanded)
In the court documents, there appears to be a potential bias against Aaron Surina, the defendant and father in the case. Unfairness emerges through the court’s decision to grant the plaintiff, Ms. Surina, custody of their children without providing Mr. Surina with ample opportunity to defend his rights or interests.
The court’s findings seem to be based on some unclear and potentially questionable elements. There is a lack of concrete evidence or substantial reasoning provided for the decision, raising concerns about whether due process was followed. The court’s verdict on the parenting plan seems to be based on vague and potentially biased information without any factual support.
Moreover, the court’s order appears to have been presented without a thorough examination of Mr. Surina’s case or his ability to provide for his children. It is not clear if Mr. Surina was given the chance to present his case adequately or if he was unfairly prejudged.
Ultimately, these documents suggest a possible bias and unfairness toward Mr. Surina, raising questions about the ethical conduct of the court proceedings in this case. Notably, the court seems to have overlooked Mr. Surina’s rights as a father, potentially jeopardizing his relationship with his children.
About The Author
