Document: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/424.0 AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT 2020-11-19 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-11-19
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents in this case reveal several instances of potential injustice and unethical conduct against Aaron Surina. The documents are significantly disorganized and unclear, with ambiguous terms like “Child Neglect,” “Assault or Script – 2nd Degree,” and “Diagnosis of Child Abuse,” and no specific details or context provided for these claims. This lack of clarity and specificity can be viewed as unfair towards Aaron, as it prevents him from adequately understanding the allegations against him and preparing an effective defense.
There is a large number of attachments without a clear explanation of their contents or relevance to the case, potentially overloading Aaron with information and hindering his ability to effectively respond. If sensitive information related to Aaron’s case was not adequately sealed, it could lead to a breach of privacy, which would be another form of injustice.
The court has ordered the appointment of a Guardian ad Litem, which might indicate a presumption of Aaron’s inability to appropriately represent the best interests of his child. This is a significant issue as it can be seen as an implicit bias against him as a father. Additionally, the court has decided that both parties should contribute to the Guardian ad Litem’s fees without clear evidence of financial declarations, raising questions about the transparency and fairness of this decision.
Furthermore, the child was seen for a child evaluation due to allegations of physical abuse and suspected initial encounters. Despite this, the responsibility for the child’s safety is thrust upon Mr. Surina without any formal process or investigation in place. The medical practitioner recommends Mr. Surina to discuss the situation with the child’s social worker or pursue an emergency protective order at the family court, placing an enormous burden on him. It appears that the medical practitioner attempted to reach the social worker but was unsuccessful, adding to the unfairness of the situation.
The court documents do not provide any clear information about why the mother is suspected of child abuse, which is potentially unfair and unethical, as it prevents Mr. Surina from fully understanding the allegations against the mother. The documents also contain confusing and hard-to-read court entries, which could reflect a lack of transparency or unfair process in the court proceedings.
In summary, the court documents suggest potential unethical conduct, judicial bias, and injustices affecting Aaron Surina, including obstacles in advocating for his child’s safety, possible bias in court proceedings, lack of transparency, and potential disregard for the child’s health.
About The Author
