Document: DECLARATION AFFIDAVIT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/428.0 DECLARATION AFFIDAVIT 2020-11-19 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-11-19
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents raise serious questions regarding the ethical conduct and potential bias against Aaron Surina, the father. The declaration affidavit, seemingly filed by Karmen Colbu, who identifies herself as the aunt to Aaron’s minor sons, appears to be based on second-hand information obtained through email correspondence with Detective Shaun Pegram. This reliance on indirect sources and hearsay could be seen as an unfair tactic that may skew the truth of the situation and negatively impact Aaron’s case.
Furthermore, it’s concerning that the information provided is related to a sensitive topic – alleged physical and sexual abuse – which is under investigation by the police and CPS. According to Detective Pegram’s email, the investigations are ongoing, and the children are scheduled for an interview at a later date. Therefore, the use of premature and potentially speculative information in the affidavit could be considered unethical and prejudicial against Aaron.
Lastly, it’s troubling that the court appears to accept this affidavit and the attached information without verifying the reliability or validity of the sources. This could be seen as a bias against Aaron, as the acceptance of potentially inflammatory and unverified information could negatively influence the court’s view of him and his case.
In conclusion, Aaron might perceive this situation as an injustice due to the potential misuse of unverified information, the premature presentation of ongoing investigations, and the court’s apparent acceptance of this potentially biased affidavit.
About The Author
