Document: APPEARANCE PRO SE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/443.0 APPEARANCE PRO SE 2020-12-14 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-12-14
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court document titled “Appearance Pro Se” appears to reflect a potential bias against Mr. Aaron Surina. The document suggests that Mr. Surina is being minimized in his role as a father and potentially being treated unfairly in his attempt to represent his rights and interests as a Pro Se litigant (representing himself without a lawyer) in the case involving his two minor sons.
Firstly, the designation of Mr. Surina as merely a ‘Respondent, Victim of crimes’ rather than recognizing him fully as the father of the involved minors seems to diminish his role and importance in the case. It appears as though his identity as a father is being overshadowed by the crimes he has been a victim of, which could potentially bias the court’s perception of his character and capabilities as a father.
Additionally, it could be unfair that he is asked to accept legal papers at his physical address while he has expressed a clear interest and preference in receiving these documents via email. This could potentially cause delays in his receipt of crucial information and thus impair his ability to adequately prepare his case, which may unfairly disadvantage him in court proceedings.
Lastly, the condition that if his address changes before the case concludes, he must notify all parties and the court clerk using a ‘super horn’ or in writing, appears to place an undue burden on him. This requirement seems excessive and could potentially be deemed as an attempt to complicate his participation in the case, further suggesting possible bias against him.
In summary, Mr. Surina’s right to represent himself and fully participate in his case appears to be potentially compromised by the court’s perceived lack of recognition of his paternal role, the lack of consideration for his preferred method of communication, and the seemingly excessive requirements placed on him.
About The Author
