Document: AFFIDAVIT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/447.0 AFFIDAVIT 2020-12-15 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-12-15
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The document under review is an affidavit in which Aaron Surina counters allegations made by his ex-spouse, Sirinya Surina, which he deems as unjust, biased, and potentially manipulative. Sirinya accused Aaron of deceit about the starting date of the 2020-2021 school year, alleging he misled her into thinking it was September 14, 2020. Aaron refutes these claims, stating that the Spokane Public School Board did indeed delay the start of the school year to this date, a fact that was widely publicized. He asserts that he relayed this true information to Sirinya, who he accuses of refusing to cooperate on matters pertaining to their children’s education.
Aaron perceives this as court manipulation, distortion of facts, and an attempt to foster ongoing conflict, all to the detriment of their children’s welfare. He believes this constitutes an injustice against him and unethical conduct on Sirinya’s part. The affidavit does not provide specific details about Aaron Surina or any case related to him. Instead, it primarily contains information about school reopening, Covid-19 updates, and school calendars from Spokane Public Schools.
A significant point of contention arises from the scheduling and location for the exchange of their children. Despite Aaron’s attempts at open communication and flexibility, Sirinya, who appears unwilling to compromise, insists on following the court-mandated parenting plan rigidly. This rigid adherence has led to Aaron being denied access to his children for three consecutive weeks, which Aaron perceives as an injustice. Furthermore, Sirinya’s threats to involve law enforcement can be seen as attempts to intimidate and control Aaron, further exacerbating the perceived injustices against him.
In sum, the document presents a case where Aaron Surina feels a significant degree of unfairness and potential bias against him. He experiences a lack of consideration for his rights as a father and perceives unethical conduct and bias in the rigid interpretation of the parenting plan and threats of legal consequences. Aaron’s ultimate concern remains the welfare of his children, which he feels is being compromised by these ongoing conflicts.
About The Author
