Document: AFFIDAVIT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/452.0 AFFIDAVIT 2020-12-16 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-12-16
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: AFFIDAVIT
The court documents reveal an apparent bias and potential ethical misconduct against Aaron Surina, who has been unjustly accused by Sirinya Surina of not returning their children on November 5, 2020. Contrary to this accusation, Aaron’s affidavit evidences multiple attempts to communicate and coordinate a child exchange on the said date, all of which Sirinya intentionally ignored.
In a seemingly calculated move, Sirinya petitioned the court for a Writ of Habeas Corpus against Aaron, alleging that he was withholding the children. However, this claim was not substantiated by the court, nor was her request for a Writ granted on November 6, 2020. Commissioner Swemmunson even confirmed that it was, in fact, Aaron’s designated weekend with the children, casting doubt on the validity of Sirinya’s allegations.
Furthermore, Aaron Surina has been subjected to a series of unfounded accusations, including numerous requests for Writs and calls for him to be jailed and stripped of his parental rights. These accusations, lacking in factual basis, are seen as vexatious pleadings and potential fraud upon the court.
Significantly, these allegations coincided with an ongoing major crime investigation into reports of child abuse and molestation at Sirinya’s residence. Despite the grave nature of these allegations against Sirinya, the court’s focus appears to be inclined unfairly towards Aaron, potentially jeopardizing his legitimate custody rights over his children.
The accusations against Aaron are suspected to be fraudulent attempts by Sirinya to gain full custody of the children, representing a significant injustice against him. He has been subjected to an unfair portrayal in the court proceedings and is being unfairly targeted, despite his consistent efforts to protect his children and his parental rights. This situation underscores an imbalance in the court’s treatment of the parties involved and raises concerns about potential bias and unethical conduct by attorneys representing Sirinya Surina.
About The Author
