Document: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/465.0 AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT 2021-02-25 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2021-02-25
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Aaron Surina, the father in a contentious custodial interference case, has raised serious concerns regarding the mother, Sirinya Surina’s conduct. He alleges that she has violated their parenting plan repeatedly, intentionally creating conflict and causing undue stress. Examples of these violations include unlawfully interfering with Surina’s scheduled pick up of the children from school and serving fraudulent pleadings.
Furthermore, she has made false allegations of kidnapping against him, which he views as continuous harassment. These actions, according to Surina, are unethical, reveal bias against him, and represent an injustice that needs to be rectified.
Court documents suggest a potentially biased decision-making process that undermines Surina’s parental rights. This is evidenced by the parenting schedule, which unjustly grants Sirinya Surina primary custody and obliges Aaron Surina to provide all transportation for visitation exchanges. The court grants her sole decision-making authority, including the choice of private schooling, a decision that seems to lack balance and consideration for both parents’ rights and responsibilities.
Additionally, the court’s decision not to allow a shared plan and to increase Aaron Surina’s time with his children only from December — a decision he cannot review — appears to reflect unethical conduct and bias against him. This lack of transparency and restrictive decision-making process amplifies the perceived injustice.
Moreover, court documents indicate potential unfairness or bias against Surina. The abrupt cessation of his Wednesday visits with his children, the dismissive responses to his concerns, and the imposition of a no communication rule between the parents are all problematic. These rules could limit Surina’s ability to discuss important issues regarding his children’s welfare with their mother and potentially isolate him from his children’s lives during non-custodial times.
Despite these challenges, Surina remains committed to actively participating in his children’s lives. However, without explicit evidence of unethical conduct, judicial bias, or injustices against him, it’s challenging to properly summarize the situation. Additional information or context related to the case would be needed to provide a more accurate summary.
About The Author
