Document: MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/468.0 MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 2021-03-08 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2021-03-08
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
The court documents suggest a series of perceived injustices against Aaron Surina, who alleges that his ex-partner, Sirinya Polarj, and her legal counsel are repeatedly disobeying a final court order that grants him the right to claim tax exemptions for their children from 2019 onward. Despite this clear ruling, Polarj has claimed the tax exemptions, with her counsel attempting to argue this violation in court unsuccessfully.
Surina asserts that the opposing counsel failed to consult him concerning pleadings that were due, denying him his right to review. He also argues that Polarj is exploiting the final court orders for her financial advantage and asserts that she has intentionally filed for dependents she is not financially supporting, aiming to deprive him of his lawful right to claim.
Surina also contends that Polarj and her counsel have shown a disregard for his financial declarations and child support worksheets, prepared by a certified professional, resulting in him overpaying nearly $40,000 in child support, which has left him financially unstable. This issue is compounded by Polarj’s refusal to pay for additional tax preparations made necessary by her actions, suggesting an attempt to financially pressure Surina into relinquishing his legal rights.
When Surina attempted to inquire about Polarj’s financial situation, she responded that it was none of his business, which Surina views as contempt of the court’s orders and intentions. Surina perceives this as a pattern of the court favoring Polarj’s legal counsel’s proposed orders without adequate review or hearings, leading to what he believes to be fraudulent judgments against him, including one ordering him to pay nearly $20,000.
Further, Surina alleges that he was ordered to pay for a non-existent 2003 vehicle excursion, a fraudulent action that cost him $4,500 and which he believes should be considered a felony in Washington State. He accuses the court and Polarj’s counsel of collusion, labeling their actions as human trafficking.
The situation is further exacerbated by issues with the children’s communication rights, as Surina has requested the removal of any restrictions preventing his children from contacting family members or emergency services, suggesting that the children’s current situation may be stifling their communication rights.
In summary, these documents suggest that Aaron Surina is facing multiple instances of bias and unfairness, including financial pressures, lack of transparency, contempt of court orders by his ex-partner, potential restrictions on his children’s rights, and perceived collusion between the court and Polarj’s counsel leading to fraudulent judgments against him.
About The Author
