Document: OBJECTION – MOTION TO STRIKE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/47.0 OBJECTION – MOTION TO STRIKE 2017-09-26 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-09-26
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Complete Summary:
The court documents suggest the existence of potential bias and ethical misconduct against Aaron Surina, who appears to face a series of unfair allegations without given the adequate opportunity to respond. Surina’s attorney has raised objections based on hearsay and lack of personal knowledge, as per the Washington Court Rules of Evidence.
Mr. Carl Wilson, a declarant, made several statements on behalf of Ms. Surina that seem to be reliant on hearsay and lack the foundation of personal knowledge, particularly regarding Mr. Surina’s financial affairs. This points to a clear violation of court rules as witnesses are only allowed to testify on matters for which they have firsthand knowledge.
Further compounding the issue are the new allegations introduced in the reply declarations by Ms. Surina. This procedural misstep denies Mr. Surina an opportunity to respond, violating the principles of equitable legal proceedings, and potentially leading to a biased judgment against him.
Additionally, there are instances where Mr. Wilson, speaking on behalf of the petitioner, is essentially testifying to what Mr. Surina allegedly said or did. This denies Mr. Surina the right to confirm or refute these claims, creating an unfair representation of his character and actions.
Moreover, the court documents also raise issues about the concealment of a bank account by the petitioner, Sirinya Surina, without any supporting documentation, further undermining the fairness of the proceedings.
In summary, these court documents indicate potential disregard for court rules, procedural fairness, and a possible bias against Mr. Surina. His attorney is now seeking to have these unsupported statements removed and fees awarded for the refusal to adhere to court rules. If proven true, this would point to a clear injustice against Mr. Surina, compromising his rights to a fair trial.