Document: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/480.0 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 2023-06-08 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-06-08
Summary (Justice Demanded)
This document titled “Order to Show Cause” appears to unfairly burden Aaron Surina, the respondent in this case, with a potential contempt hearing. The court has approved a Motion for Contempt Hearing without detailing the reasons behind this approval, which may indicate a bias against Mr. Surina. He is ordered to go to court and justify why he should not be held in contempt, placing the burden of proof on him, which seems unjust.
Further, the warning to Mr. Surina indicates a harshness that may be unwarranted. It states that if he does not attend the hearing, the court may approve the petitioner’s requests without hearing his side or even issue a warrant for his arrest. This could reflect an unfair tilt in favor of the petitioner. The document stresses the severe consequences of non-compliance, however, it does not stipulate the exact nature of the alleged contempt, which could be seen as an unethical lack of transparency.
Moreover, it is suggested that if the petitioner has asked for Mr. Surina to be sent to jail and he cannot afford a lawyer, he could request the court to appoint one. This implies that Mr. Surina might face incarceration without any clear indication of his alleged wrongdoing, which is a potential injustice.
Lastly, the document puts an added burden on Mr. Surina, stating that his papers must be filed and served by the deadline, and he must also attend the hearing. This could be seen as an excessive load especially when the charges against him are unclear.
In summary, this document appears to reflect an unfair and potentially biased stance against Aaron Surina, lacking transparency, and placing a disproportionate burden on him.
About The Author
