Document: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/490.0 AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT 2023-06-20 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-06-20
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court document in question reveals significant potential bias and unfairness against Aaron Surina, a pro se litigant. The document is filled with ambiguous phrases that hinder transparency and undermine Mr. Surina’s ability to comprehend the court’s decisions and actively participate in his case, thereby violating his right to a fair trial.
Moreover, the warning that the court documents are public unless sealed threatens to expose Mr. Surina’s sensitive information, potentially infringing on his privacy rights. The document does not clarify whether any of his private information has been disclosed, adding to the unfairness of the situation.
The court document also includes an unyielding “Prior Written Notice” from Spokane Public Schools, stating they will not initiate or modify Mr. Surina’s child’s special education services. This refusal, particularly if the current services are deemed inadequate or inappropriate, signifies an unjust action against Mr. Surina and his child.
Additionally, the decision to forgo a special education evaluation for his son, David, was made based on a meeting that ended in disagreement between the parents, disregarding Mr. Surina’s parental rights and input.
Furthermore, Mr. Surina identified a major procedural oversight where the motion for contempt was not included with the documents served by the process server. This omission denies all parties involved the opportunity to adequately respond to the motion and potentially violates the principles of due process.
The document also reveals that Mr. Surina, despite complying with the court’s requirements, was questioned by the clerk regarding his filed objection after paying a fee. This lack of guidance for self-representing individuals could compromise the fairness of the proceedings. Mr. Surina also had to personally invest to ensure the proper service of documents, which could be seen as an undue burden on him.
Overall, the court documents reveal a pattern of potential bias and injustices against Mr. Surina. These include lack of clarity in the court document, potential exposure of private information, refusal to review special education services, disregard of parental input, procedural oversights, and unclear procedures for self-representing litigants. In response, Mr. Surina has requested an extension for the upcoming hearing to ensure due process, which if denied could further point towards an unfair bias against him.
About The Author
