Document: RESPONSE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/491.0 RESPONSE 2023-06-20 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-06-20
Summary (Justice Demanded)
In the ongoing custody battle between Aaron Surina and Sirinya Surina, concerning their two sons, David and Andrew, a series of injustices and potential biases have been identified. Despite Aaron’s demonstrated commitment as a responsible and dedicated parent, he has been unfairly granted only visitation rights while Sirinya, despite her documented neglectful behavior, retains physical custody of the children. Sirinya’s disregard for court orders and harmful actions, such as exposing the children to alcoholism and potentially dangerous situations, have seemingly been overlooked by the court.
Furthermore, Sirinya has consistently undermined Aaron’s efforts to contribute to the children’s education and overall well-being, refusing his assistance in tutoring David and preventing him from having meaningful contact with his children. Her actions not only endanger the children but also violate court orders, displaying a pattern of non-compliance and high-conflict approach. Despite this, contempt charges for felony custodial interference have not been addressed, suggesting potential court bias.
Additionally, Sirinya has failed to fulfill her financial responsibilities, refusing to provide health insurance for the children, while Aaron has dutifully paid over $156,000 in child support since 2017. Yet, these considerations do not seem to have been taken into account in the custody arrangements, further highlighting the potential bias and unfairness against Aaron.
Aaron has consistently prioritized his children’s needs, providing a stable environment, emotional support, proper supervision, education, and healthcare. He has made considerable efforts to remain involved in their lives, moving closer to them, and actively participating in their education and extracurricular activities. Despite these efforts and the evidence presented, the court has not yet awarded him custody, indicating a possible bias.
In conclusion, Aaron Surina is facing significant injustices in his fight for custody of his children. These include the mother’s unethical conduct, potential judicial bias, and an unfair distribution of custody rights. Despite the lack of evidence in some documents, the overall narrative strongly supports Aaron’s claims of unfair treatment and his quest for primary custody of the children.
About The Author
