Document: TRIAL MINUTES
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/494.0 TRIAL MINUTES 2023-06-23 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-06-23
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents indicate that Aaron Surina, the father, was present in court without legal representation, which places him at a potential disadvantage. The court heard his Motion for Contempt, suggesting that he believed there was some form of misconduct or violation of a court order by the opposing party. Despite his attempts to argue his case, the court summarily denied his motion. This dismissal of his motion can be perceived as an unfair dismissal of his concerns and could be indicative of judicial bias. The court did not provide any explanation or reasoning behind the decision, which further adds to the sense of injustice. Aaron’s lack of legal counsel, combined with the court’s seemingly dismissive attitude towards his concerns, may suggest a bias against him.