Document: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/497.0 AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT 2023-07-07 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-07-07
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Final Summary:
Aaron Surina, a devoted father, has faced an uphill battle in his endeavor to protect his children’s interests and ensure their academic success. A concerning imbalance of power has been noted in his parental relationship with Sirinya Surina, as evidenced by her disregard for Aaron’s reasonable proposal to assist their son, David, with his schoolwork. Despite David’s academic struggles, Aaron’s efforts to contribute to his son’s education have been unfairly dismissed, infringing on his parental rights and potentially hindering the child’s educational progress.
Aaron’s limited contact with his children, particularly in the context of David’s school days, further amplifies this injustice. His sincere efforts to create a safe environment for his children have been overlooked; his concerns about their exposure to potentially intoxicated individuals due to Sirinya’s occupation have been met with silence, and his offers to tutor David have been declined. This lack of response to Aaron’s sincere efforts to improve his children’s situation could be seen as an institutional bias against him.
The court documents also imply potential financial exploitation. Aaron has incurred significant financial losses due to Sirinya withholding their children, preventing him from leaving for a planned trip. This incident, along with the lack of clear communication regarding child visitation and residential schedules, indicates potential abusive use of parental rights.
Furthermore, Aaron’s opportunities for defense and participation in decision-making processes seem to be limited. Accusations against him, such as bringing children to a bar, have not been thoroughly investigated. His input on educational matters has been undervalued, and his proposal for a formal evaluation of David’s skills was refused based on a vague agreement, further limiting his ability to support his son’s education.
In sum, the court documents illustrate a landscape where Aaron’s rights, contributions, and concerns as a father are undervalued and dismissed, leading to potential injustices. These instances could be seen as indicative of a systemic bias against him, thus perpetuating an environment that may be detrimental to the welfare of his children.
About The Author
