Document: MOTION
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/505.0 MOTION 2023-07-12 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-07-12
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document Title: MOTION
Merged Summary:
The court documents in Aaron Surina’s case raise significant concerns over possible bias, ambiguity, and violation of due process rights. The written divorce order, authored by the opposing counsel rather than impartial court staff, deviated from the court’s original oral ruling, creating confusion and potential for unfair treatment towards Mr. Surina.
Key details such as tax implications, medical support arrangements, Memorial Day visitation, and the validity of an approximately $23,000 judgment were left unclear in the written order. This lack of clarity undermines Mr. Surina’s ability to understand his obligations and entitlements, leading to disputes and perceived bias. This situation reflects a potential ethical breach, as the court failed to deliver clear, definitive orders, thus undermining Mr. Surina’s ability to adhere to the court’s directives and protect his interests.
Mr. Surina also perceives gross violations of his rights to due process. A key point of contention is an order denied in May 2019, which was executed prior to trial and incorporated into the court’s order without Mr. Surina’s knowledge, thereby denying him the opportunity to offer a defense or provide relevant information. Furthermore, the lack of a hearing between the oral ruling and the written order’s establishment and the failure to inform Mr. Surina of any changes represent a severe breach of transparency.
Mr. Surina was excluded from critical stages of the legal process, an action he views as unjust and potentially indicative of bias. His case highlights several instances of potential unethical conduct by attorneys Stanley Kempner and Keith Glanzer who represent Sirinya Surina, Carl Wilson, and Keith Glanzer. These occurrences have resulted in Mr. Surina facing more challenges than anyone should have to endure while trying to protect his children.