Document: MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/509.0 MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 2023-07-18 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-07-18
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Aaron Surina, the respondent, expresses serious concerns regarding the mother, Sirinya Polarj’s conduct and alleged non-compliance with court orders. He believes this constitutes unfairness and unethical behavior that undermines his rights as a father and the welfare of their children.
Aaron alleges that Sirinya violated three main court orders by relocating without notice, denying him child support tax benefits, and providing false information to the court about her living situation. These violations disrupted the children’s education, caused a significant financial loss for Aaron, and displayed contempt for the court’s authority.
Additionally, the children’s access to their father is being limited, infringing upon their rights and Aaron’s parental rights. The opposing counsel’s denial of a court order regarding tax forms is perceived as an attempt to distort the court’s clear instructions, reflecting unethical conduct and an unjust advantage.
Aaron has suffered from significant financial strain due to the withholding of crucial tax forms by Sirinya, despite court orders granting him these deductions. His attempts to maintain a balanced parenting plan are met with resistance, and his concerns about the children’s presence at Sirinya’s bar late at night are dismissed by the court, indicating a clear bias against him.
Furthermore, he requests a discovery schedule to investigate potential misconduct at the petitioner’s place of work, which may be detrimental to the children. The court’s lack of action on this matter magnifies the perceived bias and unfair treatment.
Sirinya’s neglect of parental responsibilities, unauthorized relocation, late admission of contempt, and refusal to comply with court orders have resulted in numerous injustices for Aaron and the children. The court’s lack of intervention suggests a potential bias.
Aaron’s inability to obtain verbatim transcripts of the court proceedings and the petitioner’s financial documents raises concerns about the court’s impartiality and potential procedural irregularities. He implores the court to enforce the necessary measures to ensure the petitioner’s compliance, uphold the court’s authority, and protect the interests of the children.
In conclusion, Aaron Surina is striving to protect his children amidst significant judicial bias, unfair treatment, and potential unethical conduct by the petitioner and opposing counsel. He seeks the court’s intervention to rectify these issues and ensure a fair and just resolution of the case.
About The Author
