Document: AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/510.0 AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER 2023-07-21 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-07-21
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF PETITIONER
The court documents reveal several instances of potential bias, unfairness, and unethical conduct against Aaron Surina in relation to his children’s custody case with ex-spouse Sirinya Surina. There exists a notable lack of involvement on Aaron’s part in the decision-making processes concerning their children, raising questions about the ethical integrity of this case.
Sirinya appears to be making significant decisions affecting the children’s wellbeing without Aaron’s involvement, asserting her sole authority over them. This raises ethical concerns as the children’s best interests may not be adequately ensured. Sirinya’s decision to move residences without Aaron’s approval, despite the potential disruption to the children’s lives, further underlines this potential bias. She downplays the significance of this move, overlooking potential impacts on the children’s social relationships and routine.
The accusations leveled against Aaron by Sirinya, suggesting he exploits conflicts to the children’s detriment, lack substantial evidence and may be seen as an attempt to undermine his role as a father. The scheduling of medical appointments during Aaron’s custodial time, acknowledged as “accidental” by Sirinya, may be interpreted as an attempt to infringe on Aaron’s rights as a father.
The documents also contain potential instances of unfairness in the communication and delivery of critical information. The unilateral communication from Sirinya regarding the children’s dental health and appointments suggests a lack of adequate co-parenting communication. The delivery method of the declaration is ambiguous, raising concerns about whether Aaron received adequate notice and was given a fair opportunity to respond.
There is also a lack of transparency in the creation and signing of the “23.7.21 Updated declaration Sirinya Surina,” which was done without visible involvement from Aaron. This rapid process may have unfairly excluded Aaron from the opportunity to review or contest the contents of the declaration.
Additionally, the documents are filled with undecipherable text and symbols, which could potentially keep Aaron uninformed and unable to fully participate in the legal process, further highlighting the potential bias and unfairness against him. The lack of clear and complete evidence in the documents could be viewed as an additional injustice, as it does not provide a clear basis for legal decision-making.
In conclusion, the court documents suggest potential bias, unfairness, and unethical conduct against Aaron Surina, pointing towards an unbalanced legal process that seems to favor Sirinya Surina’s interests over those of the children and Aaron.
About The Author
