Document: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/513.0 AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT 2023-07-24 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-07-24
Summary (Justice Demanded)
In the court document, Aaron Surina, the respondent in this case, highlights multiple instances of unfair treatment, potential unethical conduct, and emotional abuse. He asserts that Sirinya Surina, the petitioner, relocated without prior notice, disregarding the potential impacts on him and their children. Aaron also disputes Sirinya’s claims of managing all medical and dental appointments, emphasizing his significant involvement. He further notes that the court may have been misled about Sirinya’s duty to provide insurance for the children, suggesting a potential bias.
Aaron expresses distress over Sirinya’s alleged emotionally abusive behavior towards their children, accusing her of manipulation and obstruction of communication. This raises serious concerns about the children’s emotional well-being and suggests that the court might be overlooking this harmful behavior.
He strongly opposes the proposed relocation, stating it would significantly disrupt his commuting time and the children’s education and social networks. This contrasts with Sirinya’s claims of a minor increase in commuting time, suggesting that Sirinya’s actions may not be in the children’s best interests and could be aimed at limiting Aaron’s involvement in their lives.
Also, Aaron suggests that Sirinya decided to relocate without seeking proper court approval or providing adequate notice, demonstrating a disregard for legal procedures. If the court accepts this situation, it could be seen as implicitly endorsing Sirinya’s actions, resulting in an unfair disadvantage to Aaron.
Furthermore, evidence suggests Sirinya is attempting to limit communication between Aaron and his children, including threats of restricting his son’s Xbox access if he communicates with his father. This emotional abuse and manipulation not only undermine Aaron’s rights as a parent but also compromise the children’s emotional well-being.
In conclusion, Aaron emphasizes the need to resolve this case swiftly, prioritizing the children’s well-being and his parental rights. These documents suggest a judicial process favoring Sirinya at the expense of Aaron’s rights as a father and the best interests of their children, raising serious questions about the fairness and ethical conduct of this legal proceeding.
About The Author
