Document: MOTION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/522.0 MOTION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER 2023-09-01 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-09-01
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: MOTION FOR TEMPORY ORDER
In the court documents, Aaron Surina brings to light several issues of procedural irregularities, potential biases, and unethical conduct that have jeopardized his parental rights and the well-being of his children. Surina highlights a particularly alarming incident where a hearing was scheduled and conducted on August 11, 2023, without notifying either party involved. This lack of communication and transparency puts the entire case in a precarious state, with Surina arguing it’s a clear indication of unethical conduct.
Furthermore, Surina expresses deep concerns over the potential unilateral decisions being made by the children’s mother that could significantly disrupt the children’s lives and isolate them from their support networks. He views these actions as a direct infringement on his parental rights and a blatant disregard for the best interests of the children.
Surina’s urgent request for ex-parte orders to prevent such actions aligns with RCW 26.09.260 and federal case law, including Troxel v. Granville, underscoring his commitment to preserving his rights as a father and safeguarding his children’s interests. This plea implies that any failure by the court to uphold these laws could be deemed as judicial bias against him.
Additionally, the lack of proper service and notice to both parties, as highlighted by Surina, raises serious questions about the procedural integrity of the case and due process. The missing records and lack of prior notice for the August 11, 2023 hearing potentially represent a gross violation of ethical standards in court proceedings.
Overall, Surina is advocating for immediate intervention from the court to rectify these issues. His dedication to upholding justice and professionalism throughout this litigation process is evident, contrasting starkly with the seemingly lax standards being upheld by those representing Sirinya Surina, Carl Wilson, and Keith Glanzer. Surina’s plea for fairness and protection of rights underscores his belief in a bias against him and highlights the perceived injustices he has had to endure in his fight to protect his children.
About The Author
