Document: PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/523.0 PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS 2023-09-01 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-09-01
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Final Summary:
The court document concerning Aaron Surina is riddled with potentially biased and unfair rulings that could infringe upon his rights as a parent. The document indicates that Surina has been subjected to a Temporary Family Law Order (TFO) without clear justification, raising concerns about the fairness of the proceedings.
The document’s lack of transparency concerning specific findings about the children creates an environment of perceived bias, preventing Mr. Surina from fully understanding or contesting these findings. This opacity is a potential hindrance to Mr. Surina’s ability to protect his children’s interests.
The issue of legal fees is presented without consideration of Mr. Surina’s financial status, potentially imposing an undue financial burden on him. The possibility of Mr. Surina being held responsible for the other party’s legal costs, without an opportunity to challenge this request, is another potential injustice.
Additionally, the document references the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, remaining unclear whether these provisions are applicable to Mr. Surina. If he is indeed a service member, the disregard of these provisions could signify a substantial oversight and potential injustice.
Furthermore, the document mentions a motion for an immediate restraining order and a change in residential arrangements for the child, both of which could limit Surina’s access to his child. The lack of clarity regarding who made these motions and why is potentially unfair, as it may negatively impact Mr. Surina’s relationship with his children without giving him a fair chance to rebut.
In conclusion, the document contains multiple instances of potential bias, lack of transparency, and possible unethical conduct, all of which seem to be unfairly stacked against Mr. Surina. Such conduct raises serious concerns regarding the fairness and ethics of the proceedings, emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation into the handling of Mr. Surina’s case.
About The Author
