Document: TRIAL MINUTES
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/528.0 TRIAL MINUTES 2023-09-14 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-09-14
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The trial minutes indicate potential bias and unfairness against Aaron Surina, the father in this case. The court hearing was regarding an Emergency Motion for Temporary Orders to Prevent Unilateral Relocation and Enrollment of Minor Children, suggesting that Surina’s ex-spouse, Siriny Surina, may have attempted to relocate and change the children’s school without his consent. This unilateral action seems to overlook Surina’s parental rights, and could potentially disrupt the children’s lives and his relationship with them.
Moreover, Surina was represented “Pro Se,” meaning he represented himself, while his ex-spouse was represented by a lawyer, Jonathan Bisceglia. The fact that Surina was self-represented may have put him at a disadvantage, potentially leading to a biased hearing. The legal system often favors those with legal representation, which could result in an inequitable outcome.
Furthermore, the document fails to provide any clear information about the court’s ruling, stating only that “The Court Rules as indicated on the record.” This lack of transparency could be seen as unethical, as it does not allow Surina to fully understand or challenge the court’s decision.
In summary, the court documents reflect potential bias against Aaron Surina due to his lack of legal representation, the unilateral action of his ex-spouse, and a lack of transparency in reporting the court’s ruling.
About The Author
