Document: AFFIDAVIT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/533.0 AFFIDAVIT 2023-09-26 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-09-26
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Comprehensive Summary:
Aaron Surina, the respondent in this case, feels he is being treated unfairly by his ex-spouse, Sirinya Surina, and the court system. He alleges a series of violations of their court-approved parenting plan, with Sirinya engaging in serious misconduct, committing felony crimes against him and their children.
Sirinya is accused of deliberately interfering with court-ordered custodial arrangements, moving out of the school district, and enrolling their children in a new school without Aaron’s knowledge or consent. This action directly violates their parenting plan and Washington State relocation laws, as she failed to provide the legally required 60-day notice period or seek court approval for the change. Furthermore, these actions disrupt the educational continuity for their children, causing undue emotional stress, infringing upon their right to parental love and involvement from Aaron, and potentially heightening the risk of abduction.
Aaron alleges that Sirinya has denied any contact between him and the children when they are with her, contradicting the court order that states the children should spend two weekends with him and one with Sirinya. Such actions are distressing to both Aaron and the children, infringing on their right to communicate freely.
The court documents reveal several potential points of perceived unfairness and bias against Aaron. The holiday schedule seems to be disproportionately biased toward the mother. The requirement for Aaron to provide all transportation for weekly visitation exchanges places the entire burden of logistical planning on him. The court order restricts communication between Aaron and Sirinya during child exchanges, and the relocation section of the document imposes strict requirements on the custodial parent, potentially allowing misuse to restrict Aaron’s access to his child or to make significant changes to the child’s living arrangements without his input or consent.
For the purpose of all state and federal statutes, the parenting plan designates Sirinya as the sole custodian of the children. This designation potentially creates a perception of Aaron being a secondary parent. The children’s living arrangements seem to favor Sirinya over Aaron. Disagreements about the parenting plan are to be solved in court, without options for mediation, arbitration, or counseling. This approach may create a hostile environment, which can have detrimental effects on the children.
The court orders both parties to communicate exclusively through a third-party platform, Our Family Wizard, infringing on Aaron’s right to direct communication. Failure to respond within 48 hours to a request or notification on the platform is deemed as consent or waiver, which could lead to Aaron inadvertently agreeing to decisions he might not otherwise consent to.
Aaron feels that the court has yet to address these significant violations. Despite his proactive efforts to file an objection to Sirinya’s move, submitted a Request for Judicial Notice of these infringements, and engaged legal counsel, he feels overlooked, which he perceives as an indication of bias against him.
Given these serious concerns, Aaron requests immediate court action to mitigate the risk of flight by Sirinya with their minor children. He emphasizes the need for services or support for his two sons. It is clear that the document seems to have an inherent bias towards the mother and lack clear guidelines for resolving potential conflicts, which could lead to feelings of injustice and unfairness. Aaron Surina is seeking justice and fair treatment for his children’s sake and his own.
About The Author
