Document: AFFIDAVIT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/547.0 AFFIDAVIT 2023-10-12 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-10-12
Summary (Justice Demanded)
In a court case involving Aaron Surina, significant concerns have been raised about alleged violations of a court-ordered parenting plan, custodial interference, and opposition to standing judicial orders. These infractions, purportedly committed by Aaron’s ex-spouse, Sirinya Surina, involve their children, David and Andrew Surina. The claims are supported by an email exchange dated September 13, 2023, via the court-mandated application, Our Family Wizard (OFW).
Aaron Surina contends that Sirinya has engaged in custodial interference by deliberately preventing him from picking up their children from school, infringing on his court-ordered parenting time. This action appears to be a calculated move aimed at depriving him of his rightful time with his children.
Furthermore, Aaron alleges that Sirinya violated the court-ordered parenting plan by independently changing their children’s schools without any prior notice, discussion, consent, or court order. This act is seemingly in direct defiance of standing judicial orders, including one from June 23, 2023, which required strict adherence to the parenting plan.
Despite the parenting plan in place, Aaron alleges that Sirinya has refused to abide by it, particularly regarding their children’s schooling and custody timings. Sirinya’s relocation of the children to different schools is viewed by Aaron as disruptive and against the children’s wishes. Her unclear communication about the pick-up and drop-off arrangements has caused confusion for Aaron, who has been earnestly trying to uphold the agreed-upon plan.
Moreover, Sirinya has been denying Aaron access to the children during his designated pick-up times. Despite Aaron’s efforts to establish clear and cooperative communication for the children’s benefit, Sirinya’s responses have been dismissive and uncooperative. Her lack of co-parenting cooperation could potentially harm the children’s emotional wellbeing and disrupt their daily routines.
Aaron has fervently requested the court to admit his evidence, supported by an oath of authenticity, into the court record for immediate consideration, seeing these actions as serious violations of the court’s orders and an infringement of his constitutionally protected rights as a father. His allegations are made under oath, emphasizing his commitment to the truth and the seriousness of the situation.
The above situations reflect a potential injustice, unethical conduct, and possible judicial bias against Aaron. His attempts to protect his rights and ensure the best interests of his children are commendable despite the adversities he has been facing.
About The Author
