Document: PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/554.0 PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS 2023-10-12 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-10-12
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents reveal several areas of potential bias and unfair treatment against Mr. Aaron Surina. The court has approved a Motion for Contempt Hearing filed by the respondent, Sirinya Polarj, without providing a detailed basis for this approval. This lack of transparency could be perceived as bias against Mr. Surina.
The court also ordered Mr. Surina to bear full financial responsibility for his children when they are in his custody. This order was made without a clear explanation or justification, suggesting potential prejudice against Mr. Surina. It seems unjust to place the entire financial burden on Mr. Surina without considering his financial situation or Ms. Polarj’s ability to contribute.
Additionally, the court granted joint healthcare decision-making authority to both parties but only after a full hearing. This suggests that Mr. Surina’s rights in this critical aspect of the parenting plan were initially unjustly restricted.
The court also approved a proposed temporary family law order and a parenting plan without a thorough hearing to cover the details. This rushed and potentially superficial process could be seen as unethical and unfair to Mr. Surina, as it may not fully consider his perspective or interests.
Finally, the document’s wording threatens Mr. Surina with potential arrest if he fails to attend the hearing. This tone appears aggressive and intimidating, which can be perceived as an attempt to coerce Mr. Surina into compliance without guaranteeing a fair and unbiased hearing.
In conclusion, the court documents reflect a potential bias against Mr. Surina in the process and decisions made, suggesting unfair treatment and possibly unethical conduct.
About The Author
