Document: NOTE FOR TRIAL DOCKET
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//565.0 NOTE FOR TRIAL DOCKET 2023-11-22 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2023-11-22
Summary (Justice Demanded)
From the father’s perspective, this document reflects unethical conduct and potential bias in the legal proceedings. The fact that the case is listed as a “Relocation” case suggests that there may be an attempt by Sirinya Surina to relocate with the children, potentially against the wishes of Aaron Surina. This could be seen as an attempt to limit Aaron’s access to his children and disrupt their relationship.
Additionally, the document does not mention any efforts to consider the best interests of the children or to address any potential harm that may come from the relocation. This lack of consideration for the well-being of the children could be viewed as unethical conduct on the part of the court.
Furthermore, the fact that Aaron Surina is listed as the Respondent and is representing himself “pro se” while Sirinya Surina has legal representation could indicate a power imbalance in the proceedings. This could potentially lead to unfair treatment of Aaron and his sons, David and Andrew.
Overall, this document raises concerns about the fairness of the legal proceedings and the potential for bias against Aaron Surina and his efforts to protect his children from any further harm. It is crucial for the court to uphold ethical standards and ensure that all parties are treated fairly and their rights are protected.
About The Author
