Document: ORDER APPOINTING
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//566.0 ORDER APPOINTING 2024-01-05 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2024-01-05
Summary (Justice Demanded)
From the father’s perspective, this document reflects unfairness and potential unethical conduct in the handling of the case involving Aaron Surina and Sirinya Surina. The appointment of a visiting judge from Adams County, rather than utilizing a judge from Spokane County where the case is being heard, raises concerns about impartiality and potential bias. This decision to appoint a visiting judge without clear justification could be seen as an attempt to manipulate the judicial process in favor of one party, potentially depriving Aaron Surina of a fair hearing.
Furthermore, the lack of transparency or explanation for why the judges in Spokane County were disqualified adds to the perception of unfair treatment. It is essential for the judiciary to operate with transparency and accountability to ensure that all parties are given equal access to justice. By appointing a visiting judge without a clear rationale, there is a risk of undermining the integrity of the legal proceedings and potentially denying Aaron Surina and his sons the opportunity for a fair resolution to their case.
Overall, the decision to appoint a visiting judge in this manner raises questions about the fairness and integrity of the judicial process in this case. It is crucial for the court to uphold ethical standards and ensure that all parties are treated fairly and impartially, which does not seem to be the case based on this document.
About The Author
