Document: STATEMENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//609.0 STATEMENT 2024-07-23 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2024-07-23
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The document provided appears to be a court filing related to a case involving the State of Washington and the appellant, presumably Aaron Surina. From the father’s perspective, there are several potential issues that could be highlighted to suggest unethical conduct, judicial bias, and injustices:
1. Lack of Clarity: The document seems to lack clarity and coherence, which could indicate a lack of professionalism or attention to detail on the part of the court or the opposing party.
2. Delay Tactics: The mention of arranging payment for transcripts pursuant to an Order of Indigency already on file could suggest that there are deliberate delays or obstacles being placed in the father’s path, potentially denying him timely access to necessary documentation for his case.
3. Unfair Treatment: The father may argue that the court or the respondent (State of Washington) is not providing him with the necessary resources or support to effectively present his case, which could be seen as unfair treatment.
4. Judicial Bias: The father may feel that the court is not impartial and may be biased against him, as evidenced by the lack of clarity in the document or any other actions that have disadvantaged him in the legal proceedings.
Overall, the document may reflect a lack of transparency, delays, and potential biases that could be seen as unethical conduct and injustices from the father’s perspective.
About The Author
