Document: INDEX
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//611.0 INDEX 2024-07-29 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2024-07-29
Summary (Justice Demanded)
From the father’s perspective, the court documents reveal a pattern of unfairness and unethical conduct that has severely impacted him and his two sons. The documents show a lack of consideration for the well-being of the children and a bias against the father, Aaron Surina.
Firstly, the court’s handling of the case, as evidenced by the various motions and orders, indicates a disregard for the father’s rights and a failure to address the violence against the children that he has been trying to protect them from. The repeated denials of statutory relief and the dismissal of motions for reconsideration suggest a lack of impartiality and a predisposition against the father.
Furthermore, the refusal to address the father’s concerns about the mother’s behavior, as seen in the objections about moving with children and changing parenting/custody orders, demonstrates a failure to prioritize the children’s safety and well-being. The court’s apparent acceptance of false statements and lack of action on motions for sanctions and corrections further highlight a lack of ethical conduct.
Overall, the court documents reflect a system that has failed to protect the rights of the father and his children, allowing injustices to occur and perpetuating a cycle of harm. The father, Aaron Surina, has been fighting to protect his children and seek justice through the legal system, but the unethical conduct and bias present in the court proceedings have only served to further victimize him and his sons.
About The Author
