Document: NOTICE OF HEARING
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//626.0 NOTICE OF HEARING 2024-08-28 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2024-08-28
Summary (Justice Demanded)
From the father’s perspective, this document reflects unfairness and unethical conduct in several ways. Firstly, the document shows that the petitioner, Sirinya Surina, is represented by an attorney, Stanley A. Kempner, Jr., while the respondent, Aaron Surina, is representing himself pro se. This power imbalance can potentially lead to an unjust outcome as the petitioner has legal representation, while the respondent does not.
Additionally, the document indicates that the petitioner is seeking to quash a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) that was entered against the respondent. This suggests that the respondent is being subjected to legal action without proper representation or support, which can be seen as a violation of his rights.
Furthermore, the fact that the hearing is scheduled to take place before an Ex Parte Court Commissioner raises concerns about judicial bias. Ex parte proceedings are meant to be used for urgent matters where immediate action is necessary, and the respondent may not have had a fair opportunity to present his side of the case.
Overall, this document highlights potential injustices and bias against the respondent, Aaron Surina, in the legal proceedings involving his children. The lack of legal representation, the attempt to quash a TRO without proper consideration of the respondent’s perspective, and the scheduling of the hearing before an Ex Parte Court Commissioner all point towards a situation where the respondent’s rights may not be adequately protected.
About The Author
