Document: PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//655.0 PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS 2024-09-27 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2024-09-27
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents provided in the case involving Aaron Surina and his children, David and Andrew Surina, reveal multiple instances of potential injustices, unethical conduct, and bias that may have disadvantaged Aaron in seeking protection for himself and his children.
The quashing of a restraining order against Aaron without sufficient evidence of imminent harm or emergency circumstances raises concerns about due process and fairness in the proceedings, potentially favoring the respondent and disregarding safety concerns for Aaron and his children. The subsequent reissuance of a restraining order with specific requirements for Sirinya Surina suggests a one-sided approach that may not be in the best interest of the children.
The admission of video evidence without clear guidelines on authentication and submission procedures, as well as the directive for Stanley Kempner to provide access to Costco’s video portal, may disadvantage Aaron in presenting his case effectively. The temporary modification of the parenting plan in Aaron’s favor without a comprehensive evaluation of the situation raises questions about potential bias towards him.
Furthermore, the limitation on further filings without leave of court, particularly targeting Stanley Kempner Jr. and Sirinya Surina, could impede their access to justice and hinder their ability to address grievances. The lack of transparency and consideration for all parties involved undermines the integrity of the legal process and raises significant concerns about the administration of justice in this case.
Additionally, the exclusion of a declaration in support of a motion to quash, dismissive advice on potential criminal conduct, and vague instructions for hearings in subsequent orders may further disadvantage Aaron in presenting his case effectively and seeking relief for his children. The lack of proper consideration for evidence and delays in addressing unresolved motions suggest a system that may not fully support Aaron’s rights and concerns.
Overall, the court documents reflect a pattern of potential unfairness, bias, and unethical conduct that may have worked against Aaron Surina and his children in their pursuit of legal protection and relief. The lack of transparency, due process, and fairness in the proceedings raise significant concerns about the administration of justice in this case, particularly regarding the conduct of attorneys such as Stanley Kempner, Keith Glanzer, and representatives of Sirinya Surina and Carl Wilson.
About The Author
