Document: TRIAL MINUTES
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//657.0 TRIAL MINUTES 2024-10-02 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2024-10-02
Summary (Justice Demanded)
In the trial minutes provided, it appears that the UCCJEA (Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act) hearing involving Aaron Surina and Sirinya Surina took place before Judge Palubicki and Judge Peterson. Aaron Surina, representing himself (Pro Se Respondent), was present along with Eric Brubaker and Mr. Nixon, who was the attorney for Eric Brubaker.
From Aaron’s perspective, there are several potential issues of unethical conduct and injustices evident in these trial minutes:
1. Lack of Legal Representation: Aaron Surina is representing himself, while the opposing party, Eric Brubaker, is represented by an attorney. This power imbalance can often lead to unfair outcomes in court proceedings.
2. Judicial Bias: The presence of two judges from different counties, Adams and Kootenai, may raise concerns about impartiality and potential bias in the handling of the case. It is essential for a fair trial that the judge overseeing the proceedings is unbiased and neutral.
3. Lack of Clarity on Court Ruling: The minutes mention that the court ruled as indicated on the record, but there is no specific mention of what the ruling entailed. This lack of transparency can be concerning for Aaron as it may impact his rights and the well-being of his children.
4. Absence of Signed Orders: The minutes state that no orders were presented at that time. This lack of formalized orders could lead to confusion or uncertainty regarding the decisions made during the hearing.
Overall, these trial minutes suggest potential issues of unfairness and unethical conduct that Aaron Surina may have faced during the UCCJEA hearing. It is crucial for the court to ensure transparency, impartiality, and adherence to legal procedures to uphold justice and protect the rights of all parties involved, including Aaron and his children.
About The Author
