Document: ORDER ON CONTEMPT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//71.0 ORDER ON CONTEMPT 2017-11-08 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-11-08
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The document titled “ORDER ON CONTEMPT” pertains to a contempt hearing involving child support, medical support, children’s expenses, and spousal support, from the perspective of the father, Aaron Surina. Several concerning aspects of the document suggest potential unethical conduct and judicial bias, particularly favoring Sirinya Surina or Carl Wilson or Keith Glanzer over Aaron and his children:
1. Lack of Clarity: The document lacks specificity regarding the contempt allegations and actions leading to the hearing, hindering Aaron’s defense and creating confusion.
2. Potential Bias: The document seems to present a one-sided view, potentially indicating bias against Aaron without clear evidence or explanation for alleged non-compliance with support orders.
3. Lack of Consideration: Aaron’s perspective appears overlooked, with limited opportunity to present his side of the story, potentially leading to unjust outcomes and exacerbating existing injustices.
4. Failure to Address Findings: Mention of “other findings” without elaboration contributes to a lack of transparency, potentially undermining due process for Aaron.
Overall, the document reflects a lack of transparency, potential bias, and failure to consider Aaron’s perspective adequately, raising concerns about fairness and justice for Aaron and his children in the legal proceedings. Ethical standards and fairness must be upheld to prevent further harm to Aaron and his children’s rights.
About The Author
