Document: TEMP RESTRAINING ORDER-CIVIL
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//74.0 TEMP RESTRAINING ORDER-CIVIL 2017-11-08 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-11-08
Summary (Justice Demanded)
From the father’s perspective, this document reflects several instances of unethical conduct and judicial bias. Firstly, the Temporary Restraining Order appears to be issued without proper consideration of the facts and circumstances. The order restrains both Aaron Surina and Sirinya Surina, despite Aaron being the respondent and seeking relief to protect himself and his children from harm.
Furthermore, the order fails to provide specific findings or evidence of why the restraining order is necessary to protect the parties involved. It is concerning that the order is issued for a duration of 12 months without a clear justification or explanation, potentially infringing on Aaron’s rights without due process.
Additionally, the document does not address any allegations or evidence of violence or harm that would warrant such a restraining order. The lack of transparency and justification for the order raises questions about the impartiality and fairness of the court proceedings.
Moreover, the language used in the order, such as warning the restrained person of civil contempt and payment of attorney fees, appears to be intimidating and biased against Aaron. This type of language may create a hostile environment and hinder Aaron’s ability to seek justice for himself and his children.
Overall, this document reflects a lack of fairness, transparency, and ethical conduct in the court proceedings, potentially putting Aaron and his children at a disadvantage in seeking statutory relief and protection from harm.
About The Author
