Document: RESP RECOMMENDED COUNSELOR
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//77.0 RESP RECOMMENDED COUNSELOR 2017-11-13 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-11-13
Summary (Justice Demanded)
From the father’s perspective, this document reflects unethical conduct and judicial bias in the handling of the case involving Sirinya Surina and Aaron Surina. The document shows that the Respondent, Aaron Surina, has complied with the court’s order by providing recommendations for the child’s counselor. However, the fact that these recommendations are being made by the Respondent’s attorney, Heather Hoover, raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and bias.
Furthermore, the document does not provide any reasoning or justification for the selection of the recommended counselors. This lack of transparency raises questions about the impartiality and fairness of the selection process. Additionally, the document does not mention any input from the child or the father, Aaron Surina, regarding their preferences for a counselor, indicating a disregard for their rights and well-being in the decision-making process.
Moreover, the document does not address any concerns or objections raised by Aaron Surina regarding the recommended counselors. This oversight suggests a lack of consideration for his perspective and undermines his ability to advocate for the best interests of his children.
Overall, this document highlights a pattern of unfairness and unethical conduct in the handling of the case, where the father, Aaron Surina, and his children seem to be marginalized and their rights disregarded. The lack of transparency, potential conflicts of interest, and failure to consider the father’s input all point to a systemic bias against Aaron Surina and his efforts to protect his children from harm.
About The Author
