Document: PET RECOMMENDED COUNSELEOR
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//78.0 PET RECOMMENDED COUNSELEOR 2017-11-14 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-11-14
Summary (Justice Demanded)
From the father’s perspective, this document reflects unethical conduct and potential judicial bias in the handling of the case involving Sirinya Surina and Aaron Michael Surina. The document shows that Sirinya Surina, the petitioner, has recommended counselors for their minor child without consulting or involving Aaron in the decision-making process. This unilateral action by Sirinya’s attorney, Keith A. Glanzer, without Aaron’s input or agreement, raises concerns about fairness and transparency in the proceedings.
Furthermore, the document indicates that one of the recommended counselors, Ms. Crystl Murray-Mills, is an accepted provider for Blue Cross – Blue Shield Insurance, potentially indicating a financial interest or benefit for the petitioner. This raises questions about the impartiality and integrity of the counselor selection process and whether the best interests of the child are being prioritized.
Overall, the document suggests a lack of consideration for Aaron’s rights as a parent and a potential disregard for the ethical standards that should govern such proceedings. The one-sided nature of the counselor recommendations and the possible financial motivations behind them highlight the need for a more balanced and fair approach to resolving the issues affecting the Surina family.
About The Author
