Document: ORDER SETTING CASE SCHEDULE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//82.0 ORDER SETTING CASE SCHEDULE 2017-12-20 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-12-20
Summary (Justice Demanded)
From the father’s perspective, this court document reflects unethical conduct and judicial bias in several ways. Firstly, the document appears to favor the petitioner, Sirinya Surina, by setting a strict schedule for the respondent, Aaron Surina, to comply with various deadlines. This could be seen as unfair treatment, especially if Aaron Surina has not been given adequate time or resources to meet these deadlines.
Additionally, the order to attend mediation with a neutral third party seems biased, as it assumes that both parties are on equal footing and willing to cooperate. In cases of domestic disputes where there may be a history of abuse or manipulation, forcing mediation can further endanger the safety and well-being of the respondent and his children.
Furthermore, the document does not address any allegations or concerns raised by Aaron Surina regarding the safety and welfare of his children. It appears to prioritize procedural matters over the protection of vulnerable individuals, which goes against the ethical duty of the court to ensure the best interests of the children involved.
Overall, this document reflects a lack of consideration for the complexities of the case and a potential disregard for the rights and well-being of Aaron Surina and his children. The strict deadlines and requirements imposed on him without addressing his concerns or ensuring a fair and unbiased process suggest a systemic bias that may lead to further injustices and harm to the Surina family.
About The Author
