Document: MOTION FOR ORDER ON MODIFICATION
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//90.0 MOTION FOR ORDER ON MODIFICATION 2018-01-09 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-01-09
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The document titled “Motion for Order on Modification” reflects potential injustices and unethical conduct in the handling of Aaron Surina’s case concerning the well-being of his two sons, David and Andrew. The motion, filed by Aaron, seeks relief and protection for his children but lacks clarity on the specific modifications requested. There are indications of discrepancies in financial disclosures and a lack of transparency in the relief sought and legal authority cited.
The document instructs parties to file statements if they disagree with the motion but fails to outline procedures for addressing such disagreements, raising concerns about fairness and transparency in the proceedings. Despite Aaron’s valid reasons and evidence presented to ensure his children’s safety, the court’s response appears biased and neglects the children’s best interests. This suggests a pattern of unfair treatment and ethical lapses, potentially orchestrated by attorneys representing the opposing party, such as Stanley Kempner or Keith Glanzer. The document underscores the need for the court to uphold fairness, transparency, and the rights of all parties involved, particularly in safeguarding the well-being of Aaron and his children amidst possible injustices.
About The Author
