Document: NOTICE OF HEARING
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//94.0 NOTICE OF HEARING 2018-01-10 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-01-10
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The document titled “NOTICE OF HEARING” appears to be a standard notice informing the parties involved in a family law matter of an upcoming hearing on a motion or petition. From the father’s perspective, there are several potential areas of concern that could be interpreted as unethical conduct or bias:
1. Lack of Consideration for the Father’s Rights: The document does not mention the father’s rights or interests in the proceedings, potentially indicating a bias towards the other party. The father, Aaron Surina, may feel that his side of the story is not being adequately considered or represented.
2. Potential for Unfairness: The notice states that if the non-moving party (presumably Aaron Surina) does not appear, the motion will be granted. This could be seen as unfair, as it places the burden on Aaron to attend the hearing or risk having a decision made against him in his absence.
3. Lack of Opportunity for Response: While the notice mentions that Aaron can respond in writing before the hearing date, the limited time frame (four days before the hearing) may not provide him with enough time to prepare a thorough response. This could be perceived as a lack of due process and fairness.
4. Potential for Judicial Bias: The mention of the Court Commissioner assigned to hear the Family Law Calendar raises concerns about potential bias or lack of impartiality in the proceedings. Aaron may feel that the assigned Commissioner may not give him a fair hearing or may have preconceived notions about the case.
In summary, from Aaron Surina’s perspective, the document reflects potential unfairness, lack of consideration for his rights, and the possibility of judicial bias. These factors may contribute to his concerns about receiving a fair and just outcome in the family law matter involving his children.
About The Author
