Document: NOTICE OF HEARING
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//98.0 NOTICE OF HEARING 2018-01-12 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-01-12
Summary (Justice Demanded)
From the father’s perspective, this Notice of Hearing document reflects potential unethical conduct and bias in the family court proceedings. The document indicates that the Petitioner, Sirinya Surina, has filed a motion against the Respondent, Aaron Michael Surina, without providing a clear reason for the motion. The father, Aaron, is being summoned to appear in court without a clear understanding of the allegations or issues at hand, which can be seen as a violation of due process rights.
Furthermore, the document states that if the non-moving party (Aaron) does not appear, the motion will be granted, which raises concerns about fairness and impartiality in the court proceedings. This puts undue pressure on Aaron to appear without a proper understanding of the allegations against him.
Additionally, the document does not provide a clear opportunity for Aaron to respond to the motion in a meaningful way. While it mentions the option to respond in writing, it does not guarantee Aaron a fair chance to present his side of the story or defend himself adequately.
Moreover, the involvement of an attorney for the Petitioner, Keith A. Glanzer, raises questions about the balance of power and resources between the parties. Aaron may not have the same level of legal representation, which could further disadvantage him in the proceedings.
Overall, this document suggests a lack of transparency, fairness, and due process in the family court proceedings, potentially leading to unjust outcomes for Aaron and his two sons. It is crucial for the court to uphold ethical standards, ensure impartiality, and protect the rights of all parties involved, especially when children’s well-being is at stake.
About The Author
