Document: ORDER ON CONTEMPT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/135.0 ORDER ON CONTEMPT 2018-02-06 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-02-06
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Final Summary:
The court documents in question, revolving around a contempt hearing, raise significant concerns about potential bias and unfairness towards Aaron Surina. These documents lack concrete evidence of Mr. Surina’s alleged disobedience of court orders, including support payments and parenting/custody orders. The documents are riddled with vague language and ambiguity, leaving crucial information open to interpretation, which could lead to unjust portrayals of Mr. Surina as noncompliant.
These documents insinuate deliberate noncompliance on Mr. Surina’s part, but fail to provide any proof or explanation for these assertions. They also hint at imposing legal fees and costs on Mr. Surina without any justification, further suggesting an unjust bias against him.
The documents additionally mention a restraining order and a money judgment, yet they fail to specify who these pertain to or the reasons behind them. This lack of clarity threatens to impose unjust financial implications on Mr. Surina.
Furthermore, a reference to potential jail time, make-up parenting time, and a court review is present in the documents. However, the absence of specific details and the possibility of the court signing the document without notifying all parties involved, raises questions about procedural justice for Mr. Surina.
Overall, these court documents display a concerning lack of transparency, specificity, and fairness, which could potentially lead to significant injustices towards Mr. Surina. This document review underscores the need for more thorough examination of the proceedings, especially concerning the actions and ethical conduct of attorneys Stanley Kempner and Keith Glanzer, who may be involved in the case. Aaron Surina has already endured more than his fair share of hardship in his efforts to protect his children. Any indication of unfair bias or unethical conduct in these documents against him demands serious scrutiny.
About The Author
