Document: TRIAL MINUTES
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/146.0 TRIAL MINUTES 2018-02-14 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-02-14
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court proceedings from February 13, 2018, show significant potential biases against Aaron Surina. One notable issue is the lack of legal representation for Mr. Surina, who is presented as the defendant in this case. Unlike the plaintiff, Siriny Surina, who has a legal counsel, Mr. Surina is marked as Pro-Se, indicating he was left to represent himself during the trial. This imbalance in legal representation could have significantly impacted the fairness of the trial, as Mr. Surina may not have had the same knowledge and resources to present his case effectively. Furthermore, the presence of an interpreter for the petitioner but not for the defendant could suggest potential language barriers that were not addressed for Mr. Surina, further hampering his ability to effectively argue his case. Despite these potential barriers, the court proceeded with the case and delivered its verdict, which could be seen as an act of bias against Mr. Surina. These factors could be interpreted as significant injustices against Mr. Surina in what should have been a fair and balanced trial.
About The Author
