Document: MOTION FOR MODIF OF TEMP FL ORDER
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/173.0 MOTION FOR MODIF OF TEMP FL ORDER 2018-03-15 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-03-15
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Title: MOTION FOR MODIF OF TEMP FL ORDER – Comprehensive Summary
The document under review is a motion filed by Aaron Surina, which calls for the modification of a temporary family law order. This motion primarily requests for the court to grant Surina two weekends per month with his children. Such an appeal indicates Surina’s strong desire to be an actively involved and caring father.
Regrettably, the document seems to suffer from a significant bias against Surina, as it fails to adequately represent his perspective and to address his concerns. This bias is evident in the document’s lack of detail regarding the allegations Surina raises about prejudicial conduct towards his children. By omitting this crucial information, the document denies him the opportunity to fully express his distress, which potentially indicates a bias favoring the opposing party.
Furthermore, the document does not provide sufficient or clear evidence to support Surina’s motion. While Surina’s appeal alludes to evidence, the document does not elaborate on these details, hindering his ability to build a compelling case. This omission could be perceived as an additional attempt to undermine his argument, further isolating him from his children.
Surina concludes his motion with a heartfelt appeal for justice, emphasizing that his children were removed from his care due to unjust circumstances. He laments that he was not given a fair chance to argue for custody initially, which suggests unethical conduct in the initial proceedings and a potential violation of his right to a fair hearing.
In stark contrast, a part of the document merely provides general instructions on sealing court documents and does not contain any specific content about Surina’s case or the potential unfairness, bias, or unethical conduct against him. The lack of relevant information in this section underscores the need for more comprehensive documents related to his case, to ensure a fair and accurate assessment.
In summary, the document seems to reflect an unfair treatment towards Surina. It appears to be biased against him and lacks transparency in presenting his case, potentially limiting his involvement in his children’s lives. This raises concerns about possible violations of Surina’s constitutional rights and ethical standards in family law proceedings.
About The Author
