Document: NOTE FOR MOTION DOCKET
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/204.0 NOTE FOR MOTION DOCKET 2018-07-18 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-07-18
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: NOTE FOR MOTION DOCKET – COMBINED SUMMARY
The court documents under review pertains to a motion filed by Sirinya Surina, which demands the immediate sale of the shared family residence, compelling Aaron Surina, her ex-spouse, to cooperate. This cooperation includes showing the house, accepting reasonable offers, and adjusting the listing price to match local market values. The net proceeds, after covering all costs, are to be held in trust by Keith A. Glanzer, P.S., Sirinya’s attorney, pending further court orders. This arrangement raises concerns about the potential unfair control of Aaron’s financial interests by Sirinya’s legal representation.
Moreover, a clause within the document stipulates that any enforcement of the order will result in the “substantially prevailing party” being awarded full attorney’s fees and costs. This clause could be viewed as coercive, potentially forcing Aaron into compliance under the threat of additional financial burden.
While presiding Judge Tony Hazel’s conduct does not show blatant signs of bias or unfairness, the aggressive approach adopted by Sirinya’s attorney, Keith A. Glanzer, may be viewed as disproportionate, particularly concerning the immediate sale of the family residence and the directive for the proceeds to be held in trust by him. This strategy could be seen as an attempt to exert undue control over Aaron’s share of the property.
Though the document lacks ample details to identify explicit instances of unfairness, unethical conduct, or bias against Aaron Surina, the situation could be perceived as an attempt to marginalize his rights and financial interests. This could potentially result in a financially unfavorable outcome for him. In order to make a comprehensive assessment of potential bias or injustice, additional information surrounding the case, the motion’s content, and the circumstances necessitating the immediate sale of the family residence would be required.