Document: AFFIDAVIT OF PETITIONER
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/209.0 AFFIDAVIT OF PETITIONER 2018-08-02 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-08-02
Summary (Justice Demanded)
In the Affidavit of Petitioner, Sirinya Surina, the mother of David and Andrew Surina, and respondent Aaron Surina’s ex-wife, presents a one-sided view of the financial situation surrounding their family residence. This document seems to unfairly accuse Aaron Surina of litigious behavior and non-compliance with court orders, contributing to a biased portrayal of him.
Firstly, Sirinya accuses Aaron of creating schemes to avoid selling their primary marital asset, the family residence. She also blames Aaron for her incurring over $48,000 in attorney fees without providing sound evidence that these costs were directly related to Aaron’s actions.
Secondly, the document accuses Aaron of contempt of court for failing to pay court-ordered family and community expenses. However, it fails to mention any circumstances that may have hindered Aaron’s ability to comply, such as potential economic hardship, which can be inferred from the claim that neither party can afford to pay the mortgage independently.
Thirdly, it is stated that Aaron refused to file a joint income tax return as ordered by the court, which could have resulted in a $2,000 refund. This portrays Aaron as stubborn and financially irresponsible without presenting his side of the story.
Lastly, Sirinya asserts that Aaron claimed he couldn’t afford the court-ordered Guardian ad Litem fees while resisting receipt of the federal tax refund. This claim seems to insinuate that Aaron is dishonest, further damaging his reputation.
In conclusion, the affidavit is biased in favor of Sirinya Surina and portrays Aaron Surina unfairly. It does not provide an objective view of the circumstances or give Aaron an opportunity to present his side of the story. The document seems to reflect unethical conduct and potential bias against Aaron Surina, which is concerning for the fair administration of justice.