Document: TRIAL MINUTES
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/230.0 TRIAL MINUTES 2019-03-13 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-03-13
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents from the trial with Surina, Siriny A. versus Surina, Aaron M. seem to exhibit potential unfairness towards Aaron Surina. Aaron was not physically present in the courtroom during the Motion Hearing, instead, he was represented by Richard Kuck telephonically. This could suggest that Aaron may have been disadvantaged due to his inability to be physically present and thus unable to properly convey his arguments or respond in real-time to the arguments presented by the Petitioner, Siriny A. Surina.
Furthermore, the Court’s decision to carry on a motion hearing on shortened time for contempt could be seen as unjust, as it may have limited Aaron’s opportunity to adequately prepare his defense. The court ruling was made based on the arguments presented by the respective counsel, but without Aaron’s direct input, the ruling may be biased or incomplete.
In addition, the document does not clearly specify the reasons for Aaron’s absence in court or the necessity for a shortened time frame for the hearing. This lack of transparency can be seen as a potential ethical issue, as it does not provide a comprehensive account of the circumstances surrounding the trial.
Overall, there seems to be a potential bias against Aaron Surina as he was not physically present to defend himself during the hearing and the circumstances of the trial may have limited his opportunity to fully participate in the legal proceedings.
About The Author
