Document: DECLARATION AFFIDAVIT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/231.0 DECLARATION AFFIDAVIT 2019-03-22 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-03-22
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Title: DECLARATION AFFIDAVIT
In an exhaustive review of the court documents, Aaron Surina expresses grave concerns about potential fraudulent activities, unethical conduct, and biases against him. He cites instances of fraudulent procurement of certificates of title and other instruments related to registered land under RCW 68.12.7509, leading to his inability to finalize a property sale.
Aaron also points to potential illegalities surrounding the collection of an unlawful debt as per RCW 9A.82.045. He intimates that someone may have unlawfully, and feloniously, extracted a debt from him. Further exacerbating his distress is a judgment from the Spokane County Superior Court favoring Sirinya Surina, resulting in a financial burden of $1,000.00 on him.
In addition, Aaron raises questions about a deed of trust, with Sirinya Surina as the grantor, possibly linked to his concerns about fraudulent procurement and unlawful debt collection. These elements collectively fuel Aaron’s perception of deep-seated unfairness in these court proceedings.
The court documents, though failing to directly reference Aaron, the father, contain legal points that can be interpreted as unfair and biased. For instance, an agreement concerning the installation, repair, and maintenance of a water line was concluded without Aaron’s involvement, potentially leaving him financially liable for decisions made without his consent.
The documents also reference RCW 26.16.010, a law permitting a spouse to manage, sell, convey, or encumber their property without the other spouse’s approval. In Aaron’s case, this could result in significant decisions about shared property being made without his knowledge or agreement, which can be perceived as unethical.
Furthermore, the document discusses various agreements with companies regarding sewerage and other services. If these agreements were made without Aaron’s input or knowledge, it further underscores the pattern of bias and unfair treatment he alleges.
In conclusion, from Aaron Surina’s perspective, the court proceedings are riddled with injustices, potential fraudulent activities, and unethical conduct, contributing to a pervasive sense of bias against him.
About The Author
