Document: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/241.0 AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT 2019-04-15 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-04-15
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
In the court documents, Aaron Surina has identified a series of perceived injustices and unethical conduct against him. He asserts that he has been a victim of mortgage fraud without his consent by the opposing counsel, leading to his ex-wife’s unwarranted occupation of his property. Surina also believes his property rights were violated when he was forcibly evicted, leaving him homeless but financially responsible for his ex-wife and children. This eviction, he alleges, was based on false testimonies.
Moreover, Surina accuses Mr. Glanzer of manipulating financial declarations, forcing him to pay nearly $3,000 in disguised maintenance fees, mischaracterizing the property as community property, and ignoring allegations of mortgage fraud during court proceedings. Surina also alleges the court proceedings were biased and unfair, pressuring him to sign the house into contract within an unrealistic time frame, and disregarding facts.
Surina further claims that his property was devalued due to Mr. Glanzer’s interference, preventing him from meeting an insurance adjuster for an inspection. He also accuses Mr. Glanzer of executing documents in his name, without his consent, causing him liability. Surina asserts that his property rights were violated when his property was taken from him through an ex-parte attachment to a dissolution, which he considers an act of cruel and unusual punishment.
Additionally, Surina states that he was denied the right to rent his property and was forced to leave his residence with only five minutes to secure his personal effects. He also believes that his struggle with the Chicago Title Insurance Company over escrow and title issues is potentially biased against him.
On the issue of community property, Surina asserts that the conditions ensuring equal management and control over community property were not strictly observed, potentially disadvantaging him. He also claims that transactions involving community property were executed without his consent, which he views as a biased application of regulations and unethical conduct.
Furthermore, Surina alleges that he has been unfairly burdened financially due to debts incurred by his ex-wife before their marriage. He also believes that the child support obligation placed on him is unjust, especially if he was not given an opportunity to provide input on the agreement or if the amount is disproportionately high.
Overall, Aaron Surina perceives that he has been subjected to multiple injustices and unethical conduct which have negatively impacted his life and his children. He believes these circumstances are a result of systemic issues and seeks justice and protection of his rights.
About The Author
