Document: TRIAL MINUTES
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/286.0 TRIAL MINUTES 2019-06-10 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-06-10
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court document indicates a potential bias against the respondent, father Aaron Surina. Mr. Surina was represented Pro Se, meaning he had to advocate for himself without the support of a professional legal counsel. In contrast, the petitioner was represented by an attorney, Keith Glanzer, which may have resulted in an unequal power dynamic during the hearing. This discrepancy may have disadvantaged Mr. Surina, affecting the fairness of the court proceedings. Moreover, the document fails to detail the arguments made by both sides and the court’s reasoning for its ruling, making it impossible to assess whether Mr. Surina’s motion to continue the trial was considered fairly and impartially. This lack of transparency in the ruling process raises concerns of unfair treatment and potential judicial bias against Mr. Surina.
About The Author
